渲染函数如下:
(function anonymous( ) { with(this){return _c(‘div’,{attrs:{“id”:“demo”}},[_c(‘h1’,[_v(“v-for和v-if谁的优先 级高?应该如何正确使用避免性能问题?”)]),_v(" "), _l((children),function(child){return (isFolder)?_c(‘p’, [_v(_s(child.title))]):_e()})],2)} })
_l包含了isFolder的条件判断。
渲染函数如下:
(function anonymous( ) { with(this){return _c(‘div’,{attrs:{“id”:“demo”}},[_c(‘h1’,[_v(“v-for和v-if谁的优先 级高?应该如何正确使用避免性能问题?”)]),_v(" "), (isFolder)?_l((children),function(child){return _c(‘p’, [_v(_s(child.title))])}):_e()],2)} })
先判断了条件再看是否执行_l。
源码位置:src/compiler/codegen/index.js
export function genElement (el: ASTElement, state: CodegenState): string { if (el.parent) { el.pre = el.pre || el.parent.pre } if (el.staticRoot && !el.staticProcessed) { return genStatic(el, state) } else if (el.once && !el.onceProcessed) { return genOnce(el, state) } else if (el.for && !el.forProcessed) { return genFor(el, state) } else if (el.if && !el.ifProcessed) { return genIf(el, state) } else if (el.tag === 'template' && !el.slotTarget && !state.pre) { return genChildren(el, state) || 'void 0' } else if (el.tag === 'slot') { return genSlot(el, state) } else { // component or element let code if (el.component) { code = genComponent(el.component, el, state) } else { let data if (!el.plain || (el.pre && state.maybeComponent(el))) { data = genData(el, state) } const children = el.inlineTemplate ? null : genChildren(el, state, true) code = `_c('${el.tag}'${ data ? `,${data}` : '' // data }${ children ? `,${children}` : '' // children })` } // module transforms for (let i = 0; i < state.transforms.length; i++) { code = state.transforms[i](el, code) } return code } }观察源码发现,在对同一标签解析解析时,先解析v-for再解析v-if。 所以,在同一标签中,v-for的优先级大于v-if。